Office of the Law School Registrar:
Course Selection Advice Fall 2002/ Spring
As with many other questions one encounters in law school, the question of what courses to take is one to which
there is no single, "correct" answer. What has worked for others won't necessarily work for you. Still, it never hurts
to ask -- and in fact, we've done just that, on your behalf. Here's what various people have said
Professor Jane Aiken - The practice of law often lacks intellectual stimulation. Take advantage of the short time you
are in an academic environment. Choose some courses just because they interest you even if (maybe especially if)
you don't think you will ever practice in that area.
Professor / Associate Dean David M. Becker - Some people come to law school committed to do specific things with
their life that require concentrated knowledge. For example, someone who knows that he or she is destined to be
a tax lawyer must obviously take all of the tax offerings and, therefore, must give these courses the highest priority.
Very few people, however, fall into this category. The next priority might consist of courses most every one should
have. I always keep this list very short. Although there might be disagreement among faculty members, my list
would include: evidence, administrative law, corporations, tax (one course), and maybe a planning and drafting
course. Essentially, these courses add up to one semester's worth of time. My last priority--one that applies to
seventy-five per cent of a student's elective curriculum and one that should really be the highest priority for nearly
all students--is a simple one. Take those courses that "turn you on" to learning and, therefore, will produce the very
best kind of student experience. This could be a function of subject matter. For me, however, it was always a
reflection of the teacher. Karl Llewellyn had told me to select courses by teacher; nevertheless, I did not act on his
advice until my senior year in law school. Somehow I was certain that I would dislike a tax course, but I also knew
that I had to have at least one such course because of the work I was going to do after graduation. So I put off tax
until the fall quarter of my third year; consequently, I began the year with a course on Federal Income Tax. One
month later I knew that I was having my best time in law school. As a result, I took every course that teacher
offered over the remaining two quarters -- two tax courses and one course on bankruptcy and reorganization. It was
the best decision I made while in law school.
Janet Bolin, Assistant Dean for Admissions & Financial Aid - I would strongly advise taking a transactional class to
develop your planning and drafting skills instead of relying exclusively on a future employer to provide this type of
Suzanne Brown, Class of 1996; Partner, Brown & Wichmer; Founder, The Immigration Project - Several students
have called me recently to ask what they should take if they are interested in Immigration Law. I tell them to take
what sounds good; that they will learn the "practice" of Immigration Law (or anything else) at work, and that the
best plan of action for those interested in immigration is to go to work or volunteer at an agency serving the needs
of immigrants in any capacity - get to know their lives, their needs, etc.
Professor Rebecca Dresser - The more writing experience you can get in courses, the better.
Professor Barbara Flagg - My advice is to choose courses by professor. Ask other students, but ask several, and
know something about the person making the recommendation.
Professor / Associate Dean Katherine Goldwasser - At the risk of sounding completely crazy (a risk that's never
bothered me much), my advice about choosing courses is to take the ones that you're most likely to enjoy. Students
sometimes assume that the most to be hoped for from a law school class is that it will be "useful" or "beneficial"
in some way, but that "fun" is out of the question. I think that's a serious mistake. Granted, you may end up
miserable anyway (it's been known to happen), but your chances increase dramatically if you proceed from the
premise that misery is inevitable. Under my suggested approach, taking a course because you think the professor
is fabulous, or because the subject matter has always fascinated you, or because the "word on the street" is that
the course is great are all good reasons; taking one because you've been told that everyone should, or because of
the kind of exam the teacher gives, are not.
Nancy Hammer, Class of 1991; Director of International Division, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children,
Washington, D.C. - I suggest that second year students take a wide range of courses that interest them. Don't take
all courses within one discipline or one type of law because you never know what might spark your interest or take
you in a different direction.
Dee Joyce-Hayes, Circuit Attorney, City of St. Louis - Even if you are absolutely convinced that you know what kind
of law you want to practice after graduation, don't "pigeonhole" yourself in law school. The more well-rounded your
legal education is, the better lawyer you'll be. For example--and I know I'm biased--I totally believe that every law
student should take trial practice courses. Even if the closest you ever want to get to a court room is watching "Law
and Order" reruns, you'll be smarter, tougher, better organized, more analytical, and far more self-confident when
you develop and know how to use the skills that litigation training teaches you.
Greg Hewett, Class of 1994; Investment Banker, Credit Suisse First Boston, London, England - Enroll for classes that
you want to take for your own reasons and do not get too caught up in what courses you "ought" to take for the
bar exam, prospective employers or anyone else. The bar review class will teach you what you need to know for
the bar exam (which is as much about test taking skills as your knowledge of substantive law). Similarly, your
employer will give you the opportunity to learn, although often under fire, what you need to know in practice.
Consequently, I have no regrets for having made my class schedules based on whether I enjoyed classes with the
particular professor, whether the class was scheduled at a time that would interfere with work or extracurricular
activities, and whether the subject matter interested me. I am, however, most grateful for the courses that exposed
me to new experiences and ways of thinking. First-year courses and certain survey courses such as Administrative
Law and Labor Law taught basic legal analysis and provided a useful grounding in the subject matter. Other courses
such as criminal procedure taught the invaluable skill of reconciling and applying leading cases to fact patterns in
gray areas. Courses in tax and environmental law taught the skills crucial to integrating statutes, regulations and
administrative pronouncements to reach a conclusion. Other courses such as pre-trial, trial and the reorganization
seminar provided valuable insights into the practical application of the law. Practicum courses such as the judicial
internship also provided a fantastic opportunity for learning from practicing lawyers. Take advantage of the variety
of classes offered and do not hesitate to take a class that, for whatever reason, appeals to you.
Former Professor Brad Joondeph- For me, the single most important factor in course selection is the instructor.
Exceptional teachers can make virtually any subject interesting. It was only after I took income tax from a terrific
professor that I became interested in the area; otherwise I might never have discovered the subject. And in making
decisions about instructors, I would go beyond just those who seem to be popular with students. Many teachers
whom I thought were fantastic were not necessarily those adored by a large percentage of my classmates. Teaching
style involves personal taste. A second, less important factor is the goal of expanding the breadth of your knowledge
generally, especially into areas that might not be directly relevant to the area of law you plan to pursue in your
career. Law school will likely be your last opportunity to gain a broad-based exposure to different aspects of the law.
Once you have entered practice, you will only have time to keep up with the developments in your particular field.
Yet the insights you gain from a broader education - a more holistic perspective on the law - will be invaluable to
perceiving and analyzing problems in a manner quite different from attorneys who have focused more myopically on
a narrow field. Moreover, accepting the challenge of learning material outside your "natural" areas of interest can
be extremely rewarding, both in the sense of accomplishment and in potentially opening new avenues for your career
(as it did for me). Finally, follow your instincts and take courses that excite you. You are not going to learn much
from a class in which you are not intellectually engaged. Your enjoyment will be the most significant determinant
of how much you learn.
Professor / Associate Dean Daniel Keating - Remember that law school is the last opportunity that you will have to
learn an entire area of the law without the pressure to respond to the narrow problem of a particular client. Consider
your upperclass years as an opportunity to sample different areas of law, even those that might not seem appealing
to you on the surface. For that reason, I would advise that you try taking a variety of courses from the curriculum
rather than attempting to specialize toward one field.
Professor Daniel R. Mandelker - Study the law! By the law I mean cases, statutes, regulations and books and articles
about these sources. That's why you're here!
Tomea Mayer, Class of 1991; Director of Career Services - Law school teaches you how to learn; don't expect to
graduate with all of the substantive knowledge you need for your career. I think it is important to choose classes
which give you a broad base of knowledge and plenty of training in analyzing complex factual and statutory
problems. For example, Immigration Law is the best class I ever took for truly complex statutory and regulatory
interpretation; the skill is applicable to many substantive areas. Having said that, I also believe that every law
student should take Evidence and Tax; people expect you to know those things . . . it's pretty embarrassing when
you can't explain to your friends what is going on in Law and Order or when your accountant can't walk you through
your tax returns. Finally, don't worry about taking classes just for the bar exam; bar review will teach you all you
need to know about a topic to pass the bar; think about what you want to know for after the bar.
Professor Chuck McManis - My advice is as follows: 1)Take professors, not courses; 2) Choose courses more for
the legal skills you will develop than for the subject matter of the course (My own unscientific experience as a law
clerk convinced me that the net significance of having had, as opposed to not having had, a course in a particular
subject was gaining about 20 minutes in lead time in doing research); and 3) Take courses that you think will
stimulate your imagination, deepen your understanding of or commitment to a particular career track, or broaden your
perspective on the legal system or life in general. Three bad reasons for taking a course:
1) It's on the bar exam (the hardest part of the bar exam is the multistate, and all but one of the subjects on the
multistate are covered in the first year; the toughest thing about the essay questions is figuring out whether a given
question is actually a trust and estates question or is in reality the professional responsibility question); 2) It's an
essential course for general practice (in reality, there is almost no such thing as "general practice;" you will probably
become more specialized than you could possibly imagine, and in an area you never thought you were interested in
at all); and 3) Everyone else is taking it (what do they know?).
Adjunct Professor Miriam Miquelon, Associate United States Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois - Law school
is a luxury. It will be your last opportunity to "learn the law at your leisure." Once in practice you will have little
time to learn new principles. Instead, you must begin the process of integrating legal ideas into your case in order
to present your client's legal position to the court. The more you learn about legal principles in law school, the better
you will be at identifying the issues that are important to your client and to the court. My advice is to take courses
in procedural and substantive law that will provide you with the tools to follow your chosen specialty or area of
Allison P. Schreiber, Class of 1996; Assistant Circuit Attorney, City of St. Louis - First of all try to get in a diverse
assortment of classes to cover the subjects that are on the bar exam. You don't need to have taken everything on
the bar in law school, but it helps to have some familiarity with the material covered on the bar. I would also take
things that you think might be interesting, even if you think you already know what you want to do after law school.
I never even considered criminal law as a career, but I took some criminal procedure classes in law school, and liked
it so much I did some criminal law internships, and now I practice in the field!
Mark Smith, Class of 1986; Associate Dean for Student Services - I think there are certain core courses every law
student should take. They are: Tax (everything has tax ramifications); Corporations (it's the major legal fiction); and
Evidence. I also think it is nice to have taken some of the Bar courses, like Con. Law, Trusts and Estates and UCC-3&4. I was really glad that I had taken a number of substantive overview courses - things like Bankruptcy or Labor
Law - because when I had an issue in the area, I at least had a framework with which to start.